Imagine a situation when in the 21st century you were stopped by robbers in broad daylight, they started beating you and taking away your clothes, money, and things. And took away, but not all. And you were beaten up not entirely, because you resisted.
And then you were offered to sit down and resolve what had happened by negotiations. Negotiations about what ? Obviously, so that you do not try to contact the police and the robber goes unpunished. And he could commit crimes in the future.
For you to agree that you will no longer own what was taken from you. Then why talk? In order that, perhaps, the selected socks and shoes will be returned to you, but the robber will keep the coat and money for himself. I am sure that if a comrade from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, who published his proposal on "settlement of the Ukrainian crisis", were in the place of the victim and , which I, of course, do not wish him, then he would consider such a proposal of a robber as an insult and unheard of arrogance. And he would be right about it. But here's the problem. To offer Ukraine something similar in the case of a bandit who attacked it - Rossia - turned out to be completely not shameful for him.
China, in general, cannot be called a country that in the UN would always condemn the aggressive actions of Rossia and support decisions against such actions. More often refrained. In 2022, when many countries began to stop trade relations with Rossia in order to exclude the possibility of feeding the aggression against other states, China, on the contrary, sharply increased the volume of imports from Rossia.
As the holy scripture says: “By their fruits you will know them. Do they gather grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles? So every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor an evil tree to bear good fruit... Therefore by their fruits you shall know them."
LEXIKOUKR EST. 2013